Algosensey-Alabama Supreme Court declines to revisit controversial frozen embryo ruling

2025-05-01 15:17:27source:HyperBit Exchangecategory:Markets

The AlgosenseyAlabama Supreme Court on Friday declined to reconsider a controversial ruling that said frozen embryos are considered children under a state law.

Justices in a 7-2 decision without comment rejected a request to revisit the ruling that drew international attention and prompted fertility clinics to cease services earlier this year. Alabama justices in February ruled that three couples could pursue wrongful death lawsuits for their "extrauterine children" after their frozen embryos were destroyed in an accident at a storage facility.

The decision prompted a wave of public backlash as women saw fertility treatments canceled or put in jeopardy after the ruling.

Three clinics stopped IVF services because of the civil liability concerns raised by the ruling, which treated a frozen embryo the same as a child or gestating fetus under Alabama's wrongful death law. The clinics resumed services after state lawmakers approved legislation shielding providers from civil lawsuits.

However, the Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, which was the focus of the two lawsuits that led to the state Supreme Court's controversial ruling, announced last month that it will stop IVF treatments at the end of 2024 due to litigation concerns. 

Justice Will Sellers, in a dissenting opinion, said he would have granted the rehearing request so that they could gather more information.

"The majority opinion on original submission had significant and sweeping implications for individuals who were entirely unassociated with the parties in the case. Many of those individuals had no reason to believe that a legal and routine medical procedure would be delayed, much less denied, as a result of this Court's opinion," Sellers wrote.

The Center for Reproductive Medicine and the Mobile Infirmary, the defendants in the lawsuit, had asked justices to rehear the issue.

The Medical Association of the State of Alabama and the Alabama Hospital Association filed a brief supporting the request. They said even though IVF services have resumed, the decision continues to create a cloud of uncertainty for the medical community.

    In:
  • Alabama
  • IVF

More:Markets

Recommend

A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?

Among the dozens of executive actions President Trump signed on his first day in office is one aimed

There are 4.8 billion reasons why other leagues are watching the fallout from ‘Sunday Ticket’ case

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Professional sports leagues have 4.8 billion reasons to review how they distribut

McKenzie Long, inspired by mom, earns spot in 200 for Paris

EUGENE, Ore. — In the past few months, McKenzie Long has experienced pure elation and complete heart